June 17, 2003 at 10:57 pm #5647
These pictures always seem to appear at 3am my time, so I’ll post my thoughts now…
I was quite pleased with the look of the hallway in this shot. I did make a conscious effort to make Mike and Geoff’s world seem more “real” by extending it beyond the immediate confines of wherever they happened to be. I was conscious of my limited supply of bricks and didn’t want it to show in the finished film.
There are some things sitting at the end of the hall. I do not know what they are, but it definately keeps the hall from looking boring.
And that’s exactly why I put them there. They’re not supposed to be anything in particular – I just put a couple of 1×1 bricks at the end to break up the straight lines a bit.
One thing that people haven’t mentioned yet, which shows that I did my job right, is the forced perspective. That door at the end of the hallway is too small for a minifig to fit through – only 3 studs wide. The hallway is physically a lot shorter than it looks, again down to lack of bricks.June 18, 2003 at 6:46 am #5697
The depth of field is great in this shot. It really shows Buxton’s attention to detail in immersing us in a much more real world than most brickfilms attempt to do. He seems calm, but the door and outside world are clearly on his mind. Really a great shot and good example of depth of field and, perhaps, the rule of thirds (something we haven’t really gotten into yet in this discussion).
Ooh, right, great responses all. Sorry for making you wait Buxton…
Shot for June 17, 2003:
…But you’ll have to again, as the marathon continues! 😛
Here’s perhaps the most complex shot of OoT, in terms of elements in the shot. It’s also one of my favorites, since I love Rod. This shot should give us a bit more to talk about in terms of rule of thirds.
Submitted for your approval…
CometgreenJune 18, 2003 at 1:21 pm #5716
Well, i cant argue with this shot, well actually yes, cause i just hate glare, any but, i wont go there again :wink This shot gives Rod a bit of supremity to the other characters, and the focus is right on cue. And without watching the movie you can clearly tel he is narrating something(or that he is an evil solicitor trying to tell me something 😆 ), which has to be important. It also gives the illusion that the room is bigger, i donno how but it just seems that way to me 😀
I have to say this is an excellent shot well thought out and elegant… good job 😀June 19, 2003 at 5:42 am #5839
Rod appears to be placed up a little higher than Mike and Geoff. The camera is aimed downward just slightly. Well, it looks that way to me. This gives Rod a greater presence than the others. The focus does the same thing. The shot is set up in a way that Rod is kind of in control of it. Mike and Geoff continue bickering in the background.
As far as rule of thirds goes… (i guess this is the right rule)
Geoff is situated in an intersection of importance. This gives him a presence in the shot, suggesting that he has to make a decision: go outside to please Mike or keep reading the newspaper and get bothered by Mike frequently.
Rod is also in two of these intersections which helps him obtain even more attention.
-AlexJune 20, 2003 at 6:11 am #5963
Well. Lets give this a try.
Rod is placed at a pleasant position. Your eyes feel quite comfortable watching him. This shoot has a nice depth. The point of this picture is to focus on Rod, but at the same time show the other. When things in the background gets unclear its important that the colours not are the same. It’s important with contrasts so you get what happens and it doesn’t looks like one colour. To me it looks like he isn’t placed on a stud. In this way the corner of the room is a bit to the side of his face. The whole room gets dizzier and dizzier until it ends right behind him. This makes him clearer and makes it possible to watch the others.June 20, 2003 at 9:01 am #5973
StefanParticipantJune 21, 2003 at 9:31 am #6077
Woops, sorry. I intentionally skipped Wednesday, to give us a breather, but I just plain forgot last night. So, here we go.
Not much else to say about the above shot that hasn’t been said. There’s nice composition and use of focus. It’s obvious that Rod is talking about the two behind him, and that he is the one you should be listening to. The background is tried-and-true comedical techniques. You have a calm character talking while two people fight in the background.
I guess I just picked this shot because Rod says one of my favorite lines in Brickfilming history: “Submitted for your approval.” I think the other one would be the classic “Out…of…time.”
Shot for June 20, 2003:
This isn’t a complex shot, but does show off good shot composition. It’s framed rather nicely. Let’s see what insights it can spark. The third of four shots of Out of Time…
They’re going out for a walk.
Cometgreen, who needs to start finding some new shotsJune 21, 2003 at 5:46 pm #6091
The JanitorParticipantJune 22, 2003 at 11:16 am #6160
As the Janitor already have pointed out, the use of depth is really nice. I also like how Mike and Geoff are placed in the picture. Another thing is that you can see that it’s quite sunny outside. There are a comfortable and warm light coming through the window and the door. I don’t really know if the reflection of the window on the wall was supposed to be there, but it livens the otherwise boring wall a bit up.June 23, 2003 at 8:50 am #6256
Yep, the depth is the best part of that shot.
One other thing you notice, too, is that Mike and Geoff frame the door, which is in the center of the frame. It really draws your attention to the door, so they’re obviously about to go out.
And nice observation on the window, minifigstudios. Never noticed that before.
Shot for June 22, 2003:
The last OoT shot. I’m getting some new shots ready for this next week.
Not much special about this one, as you really need to see it in context, but it further demonstrates framing the subject of your shot. Here we go.
This is my team!
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.