Ah. I always forget to fix that first. Try now.

Yes, they’ll be cleared out, these don’t count as your official nominations.

As far as the question marks, I told Jonathan earlier, it does that for me too. What browser are you using?

I’m using firefox.

I would prefer that the text be black rather than gray. Is that just to differentiate between the test site and the live site? I found it hard to read after a while (and there is a lot of text).

In IE the “Elections” page is blank – is there meant to be something there?

Useless extra: for the positions at the bottom that are not up for election, do you consider it important to state why they are not up for election, or is it assumed that everyone already knows?

I nominated myself for minister of Information, then tried to support krick. It initially allowed me but then an error message came up to contact Schlaeps. The message was “user already supporting”. So it’s all good there.

Supporting an existing nominee works fine.

Tried to crash it by entering “*/?#@” as a nominee – got message “*/?#@ does not exist” so it’s tolerant of exotic characters.

The “name-finder” (black box that says ‘be more specific’ or ‘user does not exist’ works fine in IE.

All my testing was done via IE on XP. Couldn’t find any bugs.

Rev said something along the lines of whatever they pay you, it isn’t enough. So very true, so very true.

Awesome work, but if I could point one thing out, on the “Upcoming Events” timeline, the pop-up screen that gives details on the event pops up on the left side of the screen, far enough that I can’t see a portion of the left side of the box. Can you command that to pop up to the right or something?

-MindGame

Alright, I couldn’t figure out why it was showing those question marks when I did the smooth page changes, so for the time being I’ve temporarily disabled them.

EDIT: Nevermind. I fixed it.

I went through supporting random people. Lechnology’s little dot turned green. Does this mean he’s on the ballot?