Home › Forums › Events and Projects Forums › Contests and Film Festivals › HAT Results
This topic has 1 voice, contains 28 replies, and was last updated by
Leftfielder 3043 days ago.
| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
| Author | Posts |
| September 13, 2004 at 3:51 pm #58827 | |
![]() RevMen |
It might be a while before I get them on the events page, so here are the scores of the nominees: film………………………..story…..presentation…total What are your thoughts on the results? My personal feeling is that in voting for story, people weren’t taking “adventurousness” into account very much. I thought that Lost and The Eye of Aphrodite should have fared better in this category. For presentation I’m fairly happy with the results, though my own ballot would have looked differently. |
| September 13, 2004 at 8:23 pm #58858 | |
![]() LowweeK |
Question : Josh, did you get my ballot at time ? Here’s my method explained : I’ve selected a wide range of criteria, giving a note from 0 to 5 to each movie in each category. For the story, my criterias were : For the presentation, my criterias were : Yes, Editing is in both category because I think it has a Concerning the “Eye of Aphrodite” I do agree, I gave it Globally, my top 3 was : Daedalus & Icarus, The Factory Fix Congrats to the winners, as usual, they deserve their prize. And |
| September 13, 2004 at 8:46 pm #58861 | |
![]() RevMen |
Yes, I got your ballot Lowweek, with plenty of time to spare. In total there were 23 ballots received. I was thinking of stripping the names from the spreadsheet I made and just posting the voting matrix, so people can see how the votes tended to go. |
| September 14, 2004 at 1:43 am #58886 | |
![]() Kyle |
Agreed, That film was my favorite. I really look into other things and I think just the action stuff in it was really neat. Overall it was the one that surprised me the most. Thats what I personally look for in a film, is something I havent seen that makes me want to go and make a brickfilm right away. |
| September 14, 2004 at 1:48 am #58887 | |
![]() Markenration |
Agreed, That film was my favorite. I really look into other things and I think just the action stuff in it was really neat. Overall it was the one that surprised me the most. Thats what I personally look for in a film, is something I havent seen that makes me want to go and make a brickfilm right away. |
| September 14, 2004 at 3:01 am #58891 | |
![]() David West |
I agree with those of you that have said that people didn’t really take adventurousness into consideration. The two films that fit the theme best, EOA and The Green Dragon, both placed fairly low. The next competition should have a Theme weighting. And it should be a fairly heavy weighting, somewere around 30%. If there is going ot be an Adventure contest, I want to see adventures. Most of the HAT films REALLY stretched the theme. Though thats not to say that the general quality of the films was extremely high. |
| September 14, 2004 at 11:02 am #58911 | |
![]() hali |
Lowweek, Rather than make up my own things to rank the films on, I used what was listed on the events page as a pretty close guide:
I think it is important to consider judging guides like this so that everyone who votes is considering the same things. From a casual glance at the final results I can’t see how people followed these guidelines too carefully with respect to the story. Not only adventurousness, but originality too. I awarded higher scores to films that I saw as combining adventure and originality well. I do think that presenting old ideas in new ways can be original, but I am not convinced Aladibababad or Daedalus and Icarus did this in a way that I could reward. So I am glad dewfilms got into the top three, but I was hoping for it to rank higher. Daedalus and Icarus, in particular, is an awesome film but I was only able to rate it highly production wise. Great story too, just not for this comp. With the benefit of hindsight, a scoring method with a 50/50 split means a film may rank highly if it does exceptionally well in one category. If there were 3(i don’t know… just thinking) evenly weighted (which is important) categories, it reduces the probability of just one category being able to swing the result, being proficient in two, or average in all three may give just as much chance. Certainly some good films in the comp! Thanks again for running it, Rev. Hali |
| September 14, 2004 at 11:42 am #58914 | |
![]() Holgor |
That’d be cool! I’m really interested in that!
Exactly my thoughts, though I didn’t dare to write them down. Thanks, hali! Oh, and please date the next deadline at the end of February ’05 so I can participate Thanks for reading, PS: I think Lost should’ve scored higher. Just because of an unspectacular story and bad voice acting it placed so low? Other films scored higher with bigger mistakes. |
| September 14, 2004 at 6:49 pm #58939 | |
![]() LowweeK |
In my ballot, there were differences in the rankings between the story and technical ratings, but I didn’t want to detail them. I’ve taken the word “Adventure” in a very wide way. Why ? Just because I didn’t want to advantage a remake of LOTR or Indiana Jones, which I thought was not very original. Many movies had either originality or an adventurous story. For the presentation, I still give a fair importance to the music and sound, and you know how I’m picky on this ! Anyway, the Word Of Wisdom idea was VERY clever. |
| September 15, 2004 at 1:51 pm #59050 | |
![]() macnavi |
I did found it hard to judge on 2 different things. For me, just voting for what I though was the best, funniest or cleverest film,. would have been enough. I’ve seen the films a few times and I did find it hard to judge. But I think Sai the Magic word was the best in both categories. Very professional, but maybe that was its weakest point. A kind of “settled” animator will have it harder to win a contest, because people are more likely to choose the underdog, the surprising newcomers etc. But although I’m normally not a big Bluntman fan, I really thought this Bluntman film was fantastic and should have won in both categories! |
| September 16, 2004 at 4:51 pm #59140 | |
![]() LG |
Damn, I’ve should’ve done a short film based upon The Odyssey. :notimpressed: |
| September 16, 2004 at 11:46 pm #59237 | |
![]() Leftfielder |
Well I’m still mystified that Hoogiman’s film didn’t make the top ten, but other than that I can’t exactly complain. :wink |
| September 17, 2004 at 2:21 am #59270 | |
![]() Ladon |
Damn, I’ve should’ve done a short film based upon The Odyssey. :notimpressed:[/quote] Some people may not have been thinking about the logistics of that situation… |
| September 20, 2004 at 11:37 am #59676 | |
![]() hoogiman |
Thanks, lefty, that makes me smile. |
| September 20, 2004 at 2:24 pm #59684 | |
![]() RevMen |
I must admit that Hoogiman’s entry is one I keep coming back to on the DVD. I really like the style of humor he used. My favorite line is “I’m going to China!” The way it’s said is just perfect. |
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.


Connect with Us