Home › Forums › Brickfilming Forums › Animation and Effects › I don't understand!
This topic has 1 voice, contains 15 replies, and was last updated by
CreelUnderground 3662 days ago.
| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
| Author | Posts |
| April 20, 2003 at 9:10 pm #1217 | |
![]() unfoldingmetal |
This topic is mainly for Creel but anyone can post. As I was watching Black Night, Creel’s movie. I noticed how large and clear the file was. And it was only 19 Megabytes. Creel, what capture program do you use? Thanks. |
| April 20, 2003 at 10:13 pm #1223 | |
![]() Cometgreen |
Well…it was only three minutes if I’m not mistaken. 16 mb is quite big for that, even at 640×480. And your main question is with his compression, not his capture software. Cometgreen |
| April 20, 2003 at 10:24 pm #1224 | |
![]() Blunty |
Comet’s right – it is quite large considering it’s length… two from three… not bad I suppose 8) the movie is compressed using DivX, at a data rate of 84Kbbs at 29 frames per second (though this framerate is not neccisarily indicitive of the framerate that the film was animated at) the audio is compressed using the Microsoft ADPCM at a bit rate of 354Kbps…. I only ever use MS ADPCM for my “archive” copy – the file I make my “distribution” copy from – and the file I keep safely tucked away – it’s BIG because I compress it very little, to preserve the quality as much as possible, without ending up with an unuseable multi Gig file. |
| April 20, 2003 at 10:52 pm #1225 | |
![]() Cometgreen |
It’s 720×480? Odd. I thought he would change it to square pixels. That’s probably why you said it looked squished, Bluntman, the movie was most likely using rectangular (.9) pixels instead of square pixels. That can look a little screwed up on a comp. Cometgreen, the pixel man |
| April 20, 2003 at 11:13 pm #1226 | |
![]() CreelUnderground |
I used the shareware Dodcap for much of the film, but I am also working on my own capture software. SMA would not work with my analog capture card. The video was captured at 720×480 using my JVC analog video camera. That’s the size that my analog capture card does. I now have an Intel CS330 that I will be using. The camcorder is difficult to place due to its size. It was animated at 15 fps, converted to 29 in Premiere bacause I also dump to tape and/or dvd. Compressed with Divx because I like the quality it gives with good compression. I did not know that the ADPCM had a poor compression ratio. What audio compressor would you suggest? Sound is not really my thing. BTW, my original file with no video or audio compression is 1,394,325 KB! Having seen some ridiculously large short films, I didn’t think 16 meg was so bad. I will experiment with different compressors to see what sizes I can get in the future. |
| April 21, 2003 at 12:37 am #1233 | |
![]() unfoldingmetal |
Thank you everyone. I will use your advice to try and upgrade my films. |
| April 21, 2003 at 12:50 am #1234 | |
![]() Buxton |
For what it’s worth, I archived all the raw files for Out Of Time (dialog, video, foleys, etc) to ten CDs. That’s a lot of disk space freed up. |
| April 21, 2003 at 12:56 am #1235 | |
![]() CreelUnderground |
To archive Black Knight, I zipped the uncompressed files and then saved to DVD. |
| April 21, 2003 at 1:45 am #1239 | |
![]() Brian of Gep |
Personally, I use MP4…. It comes with DIVx. |
| April 21, 2003 at 2:08 am #1242 | |
![]() unfoldingmetal |
Actually, You guys are really melting me. |
| April 21, 2003 at 2:49 am #1243 | |
![]() Cometgreen |
Attack of the Clone: About 2 gigs of source files, 6 gigs of rendered sequences. Six gigabytes compressed down to 20 mb. Not too shabby if I do say so myself. Man, I need to put them on CDs. The sound codec applies to your format. If you’re using Quicktime, IMA is usually preferred. If DivX, most likely MP4 as Brian stated. RealOne comes with its own, and is quite good. Cometgreen |
| April 21, 2003 at 6:11 pm #1265 | |
![]() unfoldingmetal |
Ok ok. How much space is there on your computer? There is only 6 gigs on ours. So… yeah, we need a new computer. |
| April 21, 2003 at 7:14 pm #1268 | |
![]() Firelance |
Comet, you seem to use Digital Video I think; Considering the amount of disk space you use for a rather short film like AOTC… Or am I wrong? |
| April 21, 2003 at 7:30 pm #1275 | |
![]() Cometgreen |
Well, it was shot with a VHS-C camcorder, but I used Videowave to capture, and it only captures stills at 320×240. But since the entire thing was bluescreened, there was a lot of 3d stuff made. In the end, the “rendered sequences” were six finished stages rendered with the Quicktime Animation codec*, and then put into one project. I watched the RM version last night, and I’m so disappointed at the compression. It really destroys the lightsabers and other certain effects. *The Quicktime Animation codec is a lossless format, which means that it’s compressed video, but is as good as uncompressed video. The only problem is that it takes up huge amounts of space. There’s a new lossless Quicktime codec out that supposedly is as good but uses less disk space, but I forgot what it’s called. Cometgreen |
| April 21, 2003 at 9:07 pm #1281 | |
![]() Stefan |
Work is being done on lossless codecs for video and still images. Jpeg 2000, Motion Jpeg 2000 (part 3 of the Jpeg 2000 standard), PNG and MNG (the latter two are both finished products and in use in several programs). These should provide ways of reducing the amount of disk space taken by your videos while retaining quality. For still images, though, 4:1 compression is already quite a lot. Don’t expect miracles! Stefan. |
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.


Connect with Us