My goals for Film Ratings

HomeForumsGovernmental ForumsCitizensMy goals for Film Ratings

This topic has 1 voice, contains 93 replies, and was last updated by Avatar of Ladon Ladon 2739 days ago.

Viewing 4 posts - 91 through 94 (of 94 total)
Author Posts
Author Posts
January 30, 2007 at 12:15 am #256411
Avatar of Smeagol
Smeagol

Apparently not just you, Ladon only holds a measly 85% of the vote at the moment. ;)

January 30, 2007 at 4:54 am #256469
Avatar of Ladon
Ladon

“brianfast” wrote: [quote="Ladon"][quote="brianfast"]All you are doing is changing the scale from .1-10 to 1-9. 9 just becomes the new 10 exept old films can have higher scores then new ones.

Am I? Where did I write that, because I honestly don’t remember ever deciding on a final numerical scale.

What I’m currently considering is in fact 0-10. 5 key points between 0 and 10 with a minor half in between them.

I’m not sure where you’re getting your information from, but I certainly never said anything about a 1-9 scale.[/quote]
Your latest rubric has 9 options. Unless you are counting by decimals one would assume your scale is either 0-8 or 1-9. And in another of your replys you justified removing the 10 option because no films deserve it.

I personally wouldn’t vote for a guy who hasn’t finalized what he will be doing, but maybe thats just me. :wink[/quote]

Well, nothing has been final up until now because I haven’t been elected. I don’t like seeing people say “This is what I WILL do! Vote Me!”, so I decided to go along the “This is what I could do, but this isn’t nearly as good as it could be.” path instead.

January 30, 2007 at 9:31 pm #256566
Avatar of Matthew Buick
Matthew Buick

I think the point is the opposite Matthew Buick. The quantity is there so if you see a really low effects rating you know it’s not because the effects are bad.

Yeah, that’s all very well, but some films may contain a very small amount of high quality CG, and some films may contain tons of crap.

I personally think Ladon’s system to be just a tad too complex, not everyone will have the patience/inteligence to read/comprehend all that, I think this system should either be a system for the masses, or there should be more than one choice, just like the forum layout.

January 31, 2007 at 5:42 am #256676
Avatar of Ladon
Ladon

Well, if they don’t understand the final version, then they should take the time to flesh out what they don’t get. I know there are going to be some people who will run into the ratings with guns blazing, which I’m hoping to discourage. Ratings mean a lot to the director (as Tim and Watson have demonstrated), and I don’t want people to just think they know what each number means.

I’m going to take a crack at slimming that rubric right down next week, so it won’t take too much thinking, but enough to discourage the run-and-gun raters who take no notice of the meanings of their ratings.

Viewing 4 posts - 91 through 94 (of 94 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.