On the APE Voting

This topic contains 21 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by Profile photo of The Janitor The Janitor 11 years, 3 months ago.

Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 20 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #38157
    Profile photo of RevMen
    RevMen
    Participant

    I’ve updated the events page to reflect the correct numbers. Please, feel free to check them.

    As it turns out, other than Mark B and hali swapping places, none of the rankings have changed. It was a mistake that should not have been made, but at least it didn’t have far-reaching consequences.

    #38161
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous

    I want a recount of the first voting!
    I’m sure I had to be nominated … 😆

    #38162
    Profile photo of LowweeK
    LowweeK
    Participant

    Geez, you’d think an engineer would be able to get simple addition right….

    😆 😆 😆
    I’m engineer too, and I’m the first to jump on my calculator to do an addition… Geez, where’s that world going to ?

    All this had somewhat a good effect, Hali gains one place… 😆 hum, no, I meant : we should have at least 2 guys to check the sum. 😕
    On the other side, it could be interesting to do a simulation based on the rankings, in order to detect the overweight in a category…

    And why not, if the contests are being ambitious as it turns to be in the future, have several awards by category… like Oscars (link to an old topic…) :wink

    #38194
    Profile photo of hali
    hali
    Participant

    😳

    You know, in my dodgy calcs (i’d forgotten about the open and transparent voting change thread thingy… guess that happens when you don’t have to vote…) I really didn’t see it affecting my pos…

    Josh, thanks for the way you have dealt with this. I’m feeling just as much guilt as you…

    #38197
    Profile photo of Blunty
    Blunty
    Participant

    I Blame the Floridian voters…..

    edit: my mistake rev 😉

    #38204
    Profile photo of RevMen
    RevMen
    Participant

    Do you mean the Floridians?

    I did get a couple of e-mails with hanging chads. I think a recount may be in order.

    #38257
    Profile photo of Elvis Leftfield
    Elvis Leftfield
    Participant

    :roll Nepotism indeed! Well, now Leftfielder and I have proof that it was rigged…

    But we love you all anyway. :wink

    #38279
    Profile photo of The Janitor
    The Janitor
    Participant

    I think I needed more nepotism. Or other forms of cheating. Or for you guys not to hate my story.

    #38287
    Profile photo of hali
    hali
    Participant

    “The Janitor” wrote: Or for you guys not to hate my story.

    I didn’t hate it! I just didn’t think it was successful within the context of the film. Refer to my initial comments in the review thread for more detail. Of course, I didn’t get to vote.

    Hali

    #39016
    Profile photo of The Janitor
    The Janitor
    Participant

    Oh, I understand, hali. I wasn’t at all referring to you or anyone else in particular. I was mostly just pointing to the fact that if my story score would’ve been a little higher, I probably would’ve placed. It annoys me that MarkB, (no offense to Mark. He made a wonderful film and most definitely deserved his place. He’s just the unlucky example.), could place in one category, and I could win three categories, and he could still beat me. That’s my issue with the story.

    Of course, I understood going into the contest the importance of story and am not at all saying that the results are somehow wrong. I just needed to vent that.

Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 20 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.