Schlockading's film ratings terminus ad quem

HomeForumsGovernmental ForumsCitizensSchlockading's film ratings terminus ad quem

This topic has 1 voice, contains 31 replies, and was last updated by Avatar of Schlockading Schlockading 2809 days ago.

Viewing 2 posts - 31 through 32 (of 32 total)
Author Posts
Author Posts
January 11, 2007 at 10:20 pm #251961
Avatar of Ladon
Ladon

“Dragoon” wrote:

Instead of looking at recent films, people might just start looking at ‘Recent films given a high rating by Rev’ or something similar.

I guess, but what’s wrong with that? What if you like films that were given high ratings by Rev?

Yes, but what about the films that Rev didn’t rate? It would eventually be like the Digg community, where people only actually see stories that are posted by a handful of people.

January 11, 2007 at 10:27 pm #251963
Avatar of Schlockading
Schlockading

If a rule were to be enforced as to whether all ratings being shown pubclicy or none, I would generally support anonymous ratings, but if it came down to it, I guess I could resort to the opposite. Indeed, now that I think about it, if a who-rated-what system were to go into effect then several negative occurrences would most likely ensue.

Saul, I believe he means a malicious entry to the ratings of a film with the intent of dramatically changing the outcome of the averaging calculations in order to cast a negative image on the film with the resulting negative rating.

That would be correct, Ladon.

Viewing 2 posts - 31 through 32 (of 32 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.