Special Treatment

Home Forums Website Site Feedback Special Treatment

This topic contains 11 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  Stefan 14 years, 2 months ago.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #8314

    Brian of Gep
    Participant

    Rev,
    Would it be possible for you to consider special treatment for certain users that will remain temporarily unnamed? Special treatment would involve the loss of the use of emoticons, img tags, the word “hack”, and in some cases, capital letters. This would happen so that the entire community is not forced to lose their privileges, but only that the offenders may have a slight loss of their ability to annoy the other users.

    I thank you in advance for your help.

    Sincerely,
    ~Brian Geppert

    PS – The privilege to choose ones own avatar, and the privilege to post at all could also be considered as part of the “Special Treatment” plan.

    PSS – The loss of the letter “3” should definetly be included in the Special Treatment Plan.

    #8327

    Yolegoman
    Participant

    “Brian of Gep” wrote: Rev,
    Would it be possible for you to consider special treatment for certain users that will remain temporarily unnamed? Special treatment would involve the loss of the use of emoticons, img tags, the word “hack”, and in some cases, capital letters. This would happen so that the entire community is not forced to lose their privileges, but only that the offenders may have a slight loss of their ability to annoy the other users.

    I thank you in advance for your help.

    Sincerely,
    ~Brian Geppert

    PS – The privilege to choose ones own avatar, and the privilege to post at all could also be considered as part of the “Special Treatment” plan.

    That could also be considered as “Temporary Banning from the Forums”.

    :wink

    Yolegoman

    #8337

    Brian of Paco
    Participant

    “Brian of Gep” wrote: the word “hack”

    YES! YES!

    #8406

    thedarksideoflego
    Participant

    huh, i don’t think it would be worth it for revmen have to make some special prohibiting device. i don’t think phpbb already has this… but nontheless if it is simple enough to make then by all means go for it!

    #8424

    Banjo
    Participant

    Revman PMed me about something, and this is a perfect example; people think when I say hacks for forums, that hacks arent mods.. for forums.. just look at the url plz: http://phpbbhacks.com – notice the word hacks? :roll :roll :roll

    #8426

    Cometgreen
    Participant

    I think people are annoyed with, for example, your signature.

    “shutup you buttheads

    j00 all mutha flippers”

    That, and your reputation for being a pain in the butt.

    Cometgreen

    #8427

    Banjo
    Participant

    i put it because of you all.. now ill remove it because of you all..

    #8428

    Banjo
    Participant

    0h 4nd btw, 1m p0st1ng m0st 0f my p0sts l1k3 th1s f0r n0w 0n..

    #8436

    hali
    Participant

    Banjo,

    I’m not sure it is the best choice to decide to post in a way that will mean most people will CHOOSE not to read what you say. It isn’t going to help you any. Not one little bit.

    hali

    #8437

    Buxton
    Participant

    Rather than trying to limit what an individual can post, an “Ignore User” option might be more handy. It doesn’t exactly foster community spirit, but it would probably minimise the pointless flaming.

    I bet there’s a h4ck to do it. :wink

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.