The Coalition for the Reign of Free Thought 3

HomeForumsGovernmental ForumsPolitical PartiesThe Coalition for the Reign of Free Thought 3

This topic has 8 voices, contains 10 replies, and was last updated by Avatar of Lechnology Lechnology 790 days ago.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
Author Posts
Author Posts
February 28, 2007 at 10:47 pm #265718
Avatar of Mr. Less
Mr. Less

The Coalition for the Abolition of Parties and the Reign of Free Thought is now splitting up into 3 entities so we can better represent all who wish to run. Each branch will nominate its own candidates.

This is Branch 3.
Mr. Less
Gray Scale

If others wish to join our cause, please do not hesitate to do so. We expect our members to make up their own minds, and to vote for whichever candidate they agree with the most.

March 1, 2007 at 4:00 pm #265868
Avatar of Legoman182182

When the does the next edition come out? It’s getting a bit like Microsoft…


March 16, 2007 at 1:44 pm #267577
Avatar of Aled Owen
Aled Owen

What is the point of this crap!?

It’s getting a bit like Microsoft…

Yeah it is.


March 16, 2007 at 2:16 pm #267587
Avatar of Ladon

Looks like you guys aren’t too happy about not getting a member elected, so you’re branching out to try and get even more possible candidates.

March 16, 2007 at 2:36 pm #267590
Avatar of Watson

That’s partially correct. These three legally separate parties were created to prevent cases like we had last election, when Monko was unable to run, simply because he wasn’t nominated (even though he had good plans and dedication).

If you think about it, this format does little to help any single candidate from any of the entities. First of all, our former party is now split into three, each of which could nominate a candidate. This dilutes our membership, and crowds up the races. Furthermore, We are quite clear in stating that we do not actually endorse any candidate. We only nominate candidates so that they may run, even if we don’t agree with their plans — and we make it clear to our members that they are to vote individually on who they feel is best for the position.

This format is not beneficial to us. In fact, it’s beneficial to the other parties, who do not have a policy of encouraging their voters to vote individually.

March 16, 2007 at 2:54 pm #267596
Avatar of Ladon

Ah, I understand now. Three branches of the same political party with the same basic principles. Each branch can put forth a candidate, but each one will be running for essentially the same party.
Not too shabby!

Why three though? I would have settled with two, but I suppose it’s better to have too many than too few.

March 16, 2007 at 7:32 pm #267679
Avatar of Mr. Less
Mr. Less

It just worked out that way, we had 15 members, and each party requires 5.

March 16, 2007 at 10:36 pm #267756
Avatar of Ladon

Ah, right right. What happens if two people in one group of five both want to run in one election? Omfg, controversy? Or will they just switch to one of the other parties?

October 13, 2012 at 4:18 pm #419453
Avatar of Brix_Lover

Well,it’s about nominating whoever wants to run. You don’t have to be in one of our parties to be nominated by us — you could be in another party entirely. We aren’t concerned about that.

October 26, 2012 at 8:15 am #419714
Avatar of Rakibul Hasan
Rakibul Hasan

Cant join i am not at your country. If i were there must join your crew

Thank you,

October 26, 2012 at 10:05 am #419728
Avatar of Lechnology

2007. You are replying to a 5 year old thread. Seriously, admin, do you not understand forum etiquette? Enforce them and lock these outdated threads that are no longer relevant to your new site.

And deleting my post? Clearly you know what your doing.******Dont try to insult any user and before say anything please read instruction of posting a comment in a topic.****** Rethink your objective for this site and stop instructing people to post on outdated threads.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

The topic ‘The Coalition for the Reign of Free Thought 3’ is closed to new replies.