The Coalition for the Reign of Free Thought Classic

HomeForumsGovernmental ForumsPolitical PartiesThe Coalition for the Reign of Free Thought Classic

This topic has 1 voice, contains 137 replies, and was last updated by Avatar of RP Hoogle RP Hoogle 2728 days ago.

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 138 total)
Author Posts
Author Posts
February 26, 2007 at 9:55 pm #265015
Avatar of Watson
Watson

“Legoman182182″ wrote: [quote="chosen1"][quote="Cometgreen"]Let it be known that Monko, Legoman723567, and chosen1 are hereby banned from ever joining or receiving support from TQSFLP for being totally uncool. *cough*

If Expressing my honest opinion takes away your support then I want nothing to do with it. I’d rather have support from a party that allows Freedom of Speech and Self Expression.[/quote]

ditto[/quote]
So you replied with “ditto” even AFTER cometgreen pointed out very clearly that he was not being serious (a fact which should have been self-evident — I mean, what did you think the *cough* was there for?). I don’t understand you, sir.

February 26, 2007 at 9:58 pm #265019
Avatar of Cometgreen
Cometgreen

It’s quantity, not quality, Watson. COME ON!

By the way, Johnson & Johnson sucks.

Cometgreen

February 27, 2007 at 5:04 pm #265186
Avatar of Legoman182182
Legoman182182

I am rather confused. Why can cometgreen get away with incorporating humour that no one understands into a post, yet I can not?

February 27, 2007 at 6:38 pm #265229
Avatar of Watson
Watson

Well, at least he hits the mark most of the time.

February 27, 2007 at 6:55 pm #265236
Avatar of chosen1
chosen1

So, who will your party nominate? The elections are tomorrow and you need to nominate some one to remain a party.

-Christopher

February 27, 2007 at 7:02 pm #265238
Avatar of RP Hoogle
RP Hoogle

No you don’t

February 27, 2007 at 7:57 pm #265261
Avatar of Gobbob
Gobbob

Yes you do

February 27, 2007 at 8:02 pm #265265
Avatar of RevMen
RevMen

No you don’t.

February 27, 2007 at 8:06 pm #265270
Avatar of chosen1
chosen1

OK, I am sorry I must have misunderstood. It won’t happen again!!!

February 28, 2007 at 6:21 am #265400
Avatar of Watson
Watson

Alright, well I think we’re going to nominate tim, because it doesn’t look like anyone else will. In line with the goal of this party, we should use our power to allow him to run.

February 28, 2007 at 6:31 am #265403
Avatar of Ladon
Ladon

I thought Tim already stood down as a candidate?

February 28, 2007 at 6:40 am #265404
Avatar of Watson
Watson

Apparently not. He assures me that his post has been edited.

February 28, 2007 at 4:11 pm #265500
Avatar of infurno
infurno

So who are we nominating ?

February 28, 2007 at 5:22 pm #265531
Avatar of chosen1
chosen1

Looks like you are supporting Tim, as he is in the official election.

February 28, 2007 at 9:05 pm #265661
Avatar of Watson
Watson

It is extremely disappointing to me that Monko was not able to run, since he had a clearly defined plan, and was eager to take on the job. He should have at least had the opportunity to go to a vote. I assumed that he was going to be nominated by the WWRD party, and thus nominated tim instead.

This highlights the deficiencies of the current system we have in place, but hopefully, changes in TCAPRFT will help to prevent this sort of thing from taking place in the future.

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 138 total)

The topic ‘The Coalition for the Reign of Free Thought Classic’ is closed to new replies.