The topic ‘The Coalition for the Reign of Free Thought Classic’ is closed to new replies.
Home › Forums › Governmental Forums › Political Parties › The Coalition for the Reign of Free Thought Classic
| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
| Author | Posts |
| February 26, 2007 at 9:55 pm #265015 | |
![]() Watson |
If Expressing my honest opinion takes away your support then I want nothing to do with it. I’d rather have support from a party that allows Freedom of Speech and Self Expression.[/quote] |
| February 26, 2007 at 9:58 pm #265019 | |
![]() Cometgreen |
It’s quantity, not quality, Watson. COME ON! By the way, Johnson & Johnson sucks. Cometgreen |
| February 27, 2007 at 5:04 pm #265186 | |
![]() Legoman182182 |
I am rather confused. Why can cometgreen get away with incorporating humour that no one understands into a post, yet I can not? |
| February 27, 2007 at 6:38 pm #265229 | |
![]() Watson |
Well, at least he hits the mark most of the time. |
| February 27, 2007 at 6:55 pm #265236 | |
![]() chosen1 |
So, who will your party nominate? The elections are tomorrow and you need to nominate some one to remain a party. -Christopher |
| February 27, 2007 at 7:02 pm #265238 | |
![]() RP Hoogle |
No you don’t |
| February 27, 2007 at 7:57 pm #265261 | |
![]() Gobbob |
Yes you do |
| February 27, 2007 at 8:02 pm #265265 | |
![]() RevMen |
No you don’t. |
| February 27, 2007 at 8:06 pm #265270 | |
![]() chosen1 |
OK, I am sorry I must have misunderstood. It won’t happen again!!! |
| February 28, 2007 at 6:21 am #265400 | |
![]() Watson |
Alright, well I think we’re going to nominate tim, because it doesn’t look like anyone else will. In line with the goal of this party, we should use our power to allow him to run. |
| February 28, 2007 at 6:31 am #265403 | |
![]() Ladon |
I thought Tim already stood down as a candidate? |
| February 28, 2007 at 6:40 am #265404 | |
![]() Watson |
Apparently not. He assures me that his post has been edited. |
| February 28, 2007 at 4:11 pm #265500 | |
![]() infurno |
So who are we nominating ? |
| February 28, 2007 at 5:22 pm #265531 | |
![]() chosen1 |
Looks like you are supporting Tim, as he is in the official election. |
| February 28, 2007 at 9:05 pm #265661 | |
![]() Watson |
It is extremely disappointing to me that Monko was not able to run, since he had a clearly defined plan, and was eager to take on the job. He should have at least had the opportunity to go to a vote. I assumed that he was going to be nominated by the WWRD party, and thus nominated tim instead. This highlights the deficiencies of the current system we have in place, but hopefully, changes in TCAPRFT will help to prevent this sort of thing from taking place in the future. |
The topic ‘The Coalition for the Reign of Free Thought Classic’ is closed to new replies.
Copyright © 2013 BrickFilms · BuddyPress Themes by BuddyBoss · Log in

Connect with Us