December 19, 2006 at 8:15 pm #245901
Make an update every time theres a new film, like the old site!December 19, 2006 at 8:22 pm #245905
“Lord_Of_The_LEGO” wrote: [quote=”Watson”]Ruling parties are often referred to as regime’s when they persecute or oppress their people.
Such as the U.S. Government.
Sorry, couldn’t resist.[/quote]
The only time Ive ever heard the word used in that way.December 19, 2006 at 8:35 pm #245908
Well, rest assured, if I find any way to persecute and oppress through news updates, I’ll try to steer clear of it.
-SmeagolDecember 19, 2006 at 10:32 pm #245946
YOU HAVE MY VOTE.
Woo-hoo! Go, Smeagol! You have my vote!
Might I suggest you all hold off on forming your final opinion until all the nominees are presented? What if RevMen decided he wanted to run for this job tomorrow? Give everyone a chance to make their case.
And really, Mr. Less brings up a valid point.
CometgreenDecember 20, 2006 at 12:06 am #245972
What can I say? Gaining people’s unswerving loyalty comes naturally to me. Seriously though, I encourage people to check out the other candidates as well, though to my knowledge I’m the only one in the running so far. (It appears KG has formed an exploratory committee.)
-SmeagolDecember 20, 2006 at 12:32 am #245979
“Comrades”, that reminds me of what Snowball used to call the other animals in the famous communism allegory, Animal Farm. At least peanut studios will vote for you.December 20, 2006 at 7:24 am #246040
Stop twisting the mans words, dam it!December 20, 2006 at 5:21 pm #246106
History has shown that Communism does not work. I have read Animal Farm, and I assure I am not a communist and that the Party of Numenor is not communist. (I don’t really see how one could interject communism into news updates anyhow.) I thought that using the word ‘Comrade’ would add an element of humor to my announcement. Any serious criticism on a basis of word choice like this is pretty weak, and would seem to serve the idea that you cannot think of any real criticism. So thank you.
-SmeagolDecember 20, 2006 at 5:48 pm #246112
WHat are your major issues concerning the lavatorial concepts considering the state of ourissues concerning the coccix of the femur?December 20, 2006 at 6:19 pm #246119
The coccyx is not connected to the femur. And I must declare that despite an adequate degree of scrutinization, I (with no abridgement of despondency) am unable to perceive how either of these relate in any manner to the lavatory.
-This has been another straight-shooting message from your friendly Minister of Information Candidate, Smeagol.