December 17, 2007 at 6:40 pm #354105
Aled OwenParticipantDecember 17, 2007 at 7:03 pm #354112
BertLParticipantDecember 17, 2007 at 7:18 pm #354120
Legoman182182ParticipantDecember 18, 2007 at 12:15 am #354239
brianfastParticipantDecember 18, 2007 at 5:04 pm #354365
Aled OwenParticipantDecember 19, 2007 at 11:40 pm #354826
brianfastParticipantDecember 20, 2007 at 9:02 am #354942
SchlaepsParticipantDecember 20, 2007 at 4:17 pm #354992
Legoman182182ParticipantDecember 20, 2007 at 9:02 pm #355088
I say we’d take care of about 75% of our problems if we do the following:
- Ban everyone under 13. [/*]
Anybody extremely sheltered younger than 13 shouldn’t be on this forum. I’m willing to bet you just about all of them will have no clue about anything we say. Why would you want a million extraneous threads on “lolz wut is light flicker”? Besides, most 13 year old kids shouldn’t even be on the internet. They should be riding a bike, reading a book, and educating themselves instead of wasting their precious, underdeveloped neurons chatting with frightening people like me and Revmen. When I was 12 I wasn’t allowed on internet forums. I went to kids.yahoo.com and played some stupid tetris game while munching on doritos. I don’t know what kids do nowadays. The standards are way lower than they once were. There should be censors for little kids from going on internet forums.
Kids should be online only with their kid friendly-browsers that censor big scary places like phpbb forums and porn websites where they encounter pedophiles. The fact that we promote little children to forums where anybody should be able to say anything is ludicrous. We don’t want these kids’ mind corrupted. What happens when their parents find their kids reading up on whether watching lesbians roughin’ it up is moral in the LD forum? I surely don’t want parents sending me emails, first that would be pathetic having a parent contact you over something online, second of all that would be a huge pain in the ass I MEAN REAR!!! to deal with.
There, problem solved.December 20, 2007 at 10:22 pm #355116
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.