WINTER '07 – Brianfast for Minister of Discussion

Home Forums Governmental Forums Campaigns WINTER '07 – Brianfast for Minister of Discussion

This topic contains 66 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by Profile photo of Legoman182182 Legoman182182 7 years, 8 months ago.

Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 57 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #355703
    Profile photo of brianfast
    brianfast
    Participant

    Always with the slander…

    #355886
    Profile photo of Tim
    Tim
    Participant

    I hate kids. Everyone hates kids. Why should we allow them on the site? I lived in an age when parents smacked their kids, not send them to their rooms. Unfortunately, parents nowadays are too pussy to do that so we have other lame “GO STAND IN FRONT OF A WALL” detention times. Now kids are annoying, and they run around the house naked. The best thing kids can do to society is shut up and eat doritos (I wasn’t paid to say that).

    Just because we disallow them to visit the forums does not mean that they’re not allowed on the site itself. They’ll have plenty of resources. And we’d encourage to nourish their interest by READING THE BLOODY SITE like the unused resources page instead of posting a bunch of useless threads.

    #355891
    Profile photo of Legoman182182
    Legoman182182
    Participant

    Tim has stolen Christmas. :(

    Legoman

    #355940
    Profile photo of Aled Owen
    Aled Owen
    Participant

    I actually agree with Tim.

    -Aled

    #355973
    Profile photo of Felix
    Felix
    Participant

    Get a grip! This is a community dedicated to making films with LEGO. Of course there’s going to be kids!

    Instead of making them feel left out our experienced members should do their best to encourage civil behaviour and proper language by actually representing the values they preach.

    Besides, do you really think you could set a minimum age and expect youngsters to stay away? This is the internet, remember?

    #355988
    Profile photo of Shale
    Shale
    Participant

    I’ve never been under the impression that this was supposed to be a child-friendly site.

    #356002
    Profile photo of Squash
    Squash
    Participant

    Since this is a discussion about child friendliness, I thought I’d point out-

    “The Rules” wrote: 1. Profanity or vulgar images – This includes inappropriate words, inappropriate sexual references and other crude statements. Again, though this is not a children’s site, we do not wish to offend or ostracize any younger members or cause their parents to bar them from accessing the website. Knowingly posting obscene pictures is enough for an automatic ban.

    So in technicality, there are rules against this, but they are not enforced. I will not say whether I feel these are fair or not, I just thought I’d put them here for those discussing to… discuss.

    #356036
    Profile photo of Tim
    Tim
    Participant

    Who cares about the rules? this is barely a children’s site. The majority of people who visit this site are at least 15.

    #356050
    Profile photo of Schlaeps
    Schlaeps
    Participant

    I say we divide Brickfilms into three separate entities: BrickfilmsBabies (BrickBabies? BrickBabes?), Brickfilms Classic, and BF17+. Users would decided by age group of course.

    #356051
    Profile photo of Tim
    Tim
    Participant

    BF17+ sounds like a movie rating for porn movies.

    No.

Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 57 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.