WINTER '07 – Brianfast for Minister of Film Rating

Frontpage Forums Governmental Forums Campaigns WINTER '07 – Brianfast for Minister of Film Rating

This topic contains 22 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by Profile photo of Felix Felix 7 years, 4 months ago.

Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #354321
    Profile photo of Schlaeps
    Schlaeps
    Member

    Plus, not all browsers support javascript and some people have it disabled.

    I’ve made sure to make this (and mostly any javascript I write) cross-browser friendly.

    In this particular case (as well as with the control panel) if you don’t have javascript enabled, nothing changes in terms of basic functionality.

    #354375
    Profile photo of BertL
    BertL
    Member

    I like the “seperate ratings for review panel members” idea; I don’t like the “absolute freedom for ratings” idea.

    #354435
    Profile photo of An Old Ore
    An Old Ore
    Member

    Q: How will your system ensure that ratings are meaningful?

    Specifically, if a user glances at the ratings, will they be able to say “this film is better than that other film?”

    #354888
    Profile photo of brianfast
    brianfast
    Member

    “An Old Ore” wrote: Q: How will your system ensure that ratings are meaningful?

    Specifically, if a user glances at the ratings, will they be able to say “this film is better than that other film?”

    I will have seperate ratings for patron raters and review panel ratings. The review panel ratings will try to be more technically accurate while the patron ratings will probably be more “average fan” accurate.

    For example, transformers has mixed reviews from “critics” but it seems like everyone thinks Transformers is an awesome movie and its a must watch.

    I think it is important to get 2 perspectives. In fact, I think this system will be MORE accurate then Ladon’s system in a sense.

    Also, despite previous examples of abuse in the brickfilms directory (probably by patrons) TCOTY still has favorable reviews. Things even out over time.

    #354890
    Profile photo of brianfast
    brianfast
    Member

    “An Old Ore” wrote: I’m kinda partial to the rubric simply on the basis that it gives everyone a general idea as to how the ratings will be interpreted.

    Specific Example: If there is a film with no music, and the possible rating for music is a non-rubric 0 to 10, how would you resolve that?

    A: Giving a rating of 5?
    B: Giving a rating of 0?
    C: Giving no rating? (Null value)
    D: Other?

    The current system allows a rater to confidently give a rating, knowing that they are not penalizing a film for not having a specific element. how would your system work?

    Well, the review panel would still have a rubric of sorts, I probably would keep Ladon’s for continuity.

    But for patrons I would probably add a line of text advising (rough, not good english) “if no elements of a component are present give a 0″. But at the same time if someone thinks that no music adds to the suspense then I would tolerate positive ratings. It is possible to have horrific music that gives headaches; why should such music get a higher rating then a movie that doesn’t give anything at all?

    #354931
    Profile photo of LegoShark
    LegoShark
    Member

    Running for every single thing= no vote. from anyone.

    #354932
    Profile photo of Ladon
    Ladon
    Member

    What are the patron ratings going to be based on?

    -Ladon

    #355147
    Profile photo of brianfast
    brianfast
    Member

    Whatever they like (same categories if thats what you meant). The review panel ratings box will be there for people seeking more standardized reviews from more experienced reviewers. However, I don’t think letting patrons rate freely will damage ratings… the old directory had this and was relatively accurate. With separate review panel ratings I don’t think patrons will be as inclined to give movies bad ratings in order to “average things out” to get the movie the rating they want.

    #355212
    Profile photo of An Old Ore
    An Old Ore
    Member

    I asked Ladon this, but I neglected to ask you:

    Do you have a plan or ideas to encourage / reward members for rating films?

    As you stated, more ratings = greater accuracy, so encouraging members (specifically patrons) to rate films is fairly high on the agenda for the MoF Ratings.

    (I’m asking harder questions of those running for Film Ratings since I’ll be working closely with that minister since our ministries are tied together.)

    #355336
    Profile photo of brianfast
    brianfast
    Member

    I would ask to have a sticky thread in P&R that tells people how to rate movies and encourages people to rate movies.

    Another idea I have been kicking around is giving patrons another rank based off the number of ratings. e.g. 50 ratings = bronze rater 100=silver rater 250= gold rater ect… Please let me know what you think of that because I am on the fence.

Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 23 total)

The topic ‘WINTER '07 – Brianfast for Minister of Film Rating’ is closed to new replies.