Seems a little too punishment-based, if you ask me.
P.S. White, while you have most of the questions answered within the body of your platform is there a reason you chose not to answer the candidate questions specifically?
Nope, not really. Honestly, I did look at the format of a few other candidates posts before posting my own and a few had a simple Q&A. I just decided to do something different, but of course I’ll add a few questions and answers in.
As for the punishment thing, as I said, its still an idea. If elected, I’ll be needing opinions and suggestions from everyone.
“White” wrote: As for the punishment thing, as I said, its still an idea. If elected, I’ll be needing opinions and suggestions from everyone.
I’m just saying that it seems like you’re organizing a police force rather than a leadership, or that’s the vibe that I’m getting.
this forum needs more moderation and enforcement. It’s all talk and no show here. As long as it is tastefully done, I think he is in the right direction.
You have my support at the moment.
You have my full support. Good luck
Seems to me a point system could really discourage newbies from posting in the forum. I know that not all newbies stick around but you said it yourself in your initial post
How would this work? If you exempt newbies from punishment though then I’m pretty sure that you would be creating a very solidly defined senior member. A member who would probably be more refined, but still.
I certainly don’t think that a strike system would be a good idea or even effective.
The topic ‘Winter – White for Minister of Discussion’ is closed to new replies.
Copyright © 2015 BrickFilms · BuddyPress Themes by BuddyBoss ·